Hey there.

So... you use an ad blocker. That's cool. Sometimes we do too.


But without ad revenue, we wouldn't even be here. And we might not be here much longer.

Please disable your ad blocker and click to continue.

Page 1 of 2 12 Last
  1. #1
    D3M0N2009 Guest

    Valve Explains Why They Avoid the 'Too Technical' PS3 Console

    How come we've yet to see Valve develop something for the PS3? Being one of the better game developers out there, you'd think they'd be one of the first to get in line tweaking with the PS3's hardware.

    Apparently, that's not the case as they seem to find it too complicated.

    Tom Leonard, Valve Game Designer, had this to say when asked about this very issue over at E3:

    "The PC and the 360 are just more straightforward. We can focus on what we want to do, which is make game experiences, instead of sweating bullets over obscure architectural decisions they make with their platform... I didn't come into this business in the 90s because of some technical fetish.

    I came in because I wanted to give people experiences that made them have fun."


    More PlayStation 3 News...

  2. #2
    otarumx Guest
    Ok let me translate:

    "We came to this business to make the most money with the least amount of work, so, we stick to the PC and 360 because they are easy to program for and we are too lazy to learn any other way of programming. I mean if we could have an engine that could just do all the work for us we could just sit on our asses all day and count the money."

    Did that read like I was pissed off at Valve?, All kidding aside I think Valve should just stick to PC, they don't support 360 as much as they do PC, they just dumped code and forgot about it. I really hope other companies aren't as lazy and think of themselves as all high and mighty.

  3. #3
    vfxraven19 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by otarumx View Post
    Ok let me translate:

    "We came to this business to make the most money with the least amount of work, so, we stick to the PC and 360 because they are easy to program for and we are too lazy to learn any other way of programming. I mean if we could have an engine that could just do all the work for us we could just sit on our asses all day and count the money."

    Did that read like I was pissed off at Valve?, All kidding aside I think Valve should just stick to PC, they don't support 360 as much as they do PC, they just dumped code and forgot about it. I really hope other companies aren't as lazy and think of themselves as all high and mighty.
    Translated just fine!

    They should really just focus on PC, besides most of their PC work runs just fine and should be played on PC anyway. Steam is keeping them alive with digital downloads.

  4. #4
    brent0r Guest
    EA, Kojima, Namco and now Valve.. I love the PS3 dont get me wrong but if its turning big developers away its gotta say something.

  5. #5
    kablooey Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by otarumx View Post
    Ok let me translate:

    "We came to this business to make the most money with the least amount of work, so, we stick to the PC and 360 because they are easy to program for and we are too lazy to learn any other way of programming. I mean if we could have an engine that could just do all the work for us we could just sit on our asses all day and count the money."

    Did that read like I was pissed off at Valve?, All kidding aside I think Valve should just stick to PC, they don't support 360 as much as they do PC, they just dumped code and forgot about it. I really hope other companies aren't as lazy and think of themselves as all high and mighty.
    You damn right otarumx!!!

  6. #6
    lawllawl Guest
    Well they do have a very good point. The PC and 360 are much more simplier (for one the 360 is pretty much based off a PC) than a PS3.
    I mean they're here to make a lot of money and well making their developers learn a new programming language would take time and money.

  7. #7
    ZBlacktt Guest
    Last I checked, Sony has 19 in house game developer companies. Which is one shy twice as many as Xbox. So, I don't think we should care if these lazy developers want to stick with the cookie cutter console. The PS3 is doing just fine and so is Sony. Hence why they are said to have won E3 this year. There only getting better with time.

  8. #8
    sorceror Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by brent0r View Post
    EA, Kojima, Namco and now Valve.. I love the PS3 dont get me wrong but if its turning big developers away its gotta say something.
    Progamming the Cell is different from programming traditional CPUs, and the available tools don't give developers a lot of handholding. That said, Sony's apparently been good about spreading tricks and techniques around as they are developed/discovered.

    Valve doesn't owe Sony or PS3 owners anything, and they can choose not to develop for the PS3 if that's what they want. Personally, I figure it wouldn't hurt them to form a small team to experiment with the PS3 and see what they can learn from it, but it's their choice.

  9. #9
    jemarval Guest

    Two thumbs down for valve

    Totally agree otaru.

    With so many ps3 exclusives already, all valve does is prove their mediocrity with this announces. Ok, many others have managed to create outstanding games, many among the best in videogame history, and all valve can say is: "Itīs really too hard, we better stick with what we know".

  10. #10
    semitope Guest
    Valve has not made a major game separate from halflife. Everything is pretty much a mod of HL with upgrades to the same source engine they have been using forever. Their only "innovation" is steam and thus my opinion of them is that they are really not your regular developer at all. They peddle mods and other ppls games, thats it.

Page 1 of 2 12 Last

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in