- Join Date
- Apr 2005
Sony to Expand PSN with Video Content and PS1 / PS2 Classics
According to Senior Director Susan Panico, Sony plans to introduce The Tester on PlayStation Network this month while VP Peter Dille has also hinted to IGN that more PS1 and PS2 classics are destined for PSN.
The Tester joins other original programming, such as PULSE and Qore, as the company looks to continue expanding its video content on the service.
To quote: "We've had a very different strategic approach by having our service offered for free," Panico said. "Offering a premium service someday that might make sense, but right now it's important to deliver a great array of digital content for free to help broaden PlayStation Network's access."
Dille stated, to quote: "From our side, we're going through our own studio organization and trying to make sure all these old games are out there so that we can lead by example, but we're also communicating with all the third-parties about the success of the Final Fantasy games, and other PS1 and PS2 classics.
By all means, I think people can look for more of that because once the third-parties see how this works, it's just found money. There's not a whole lot of work that has to go into it and once we can get it up on the network, it finds an audience pretty quickly."
More PlayStation 3 News...
02-03-2010 #2MMBtalk Guest
This will certainly be welcome especially in the regions that have been ignored by the video store that operates exclusively in Europe and recently extended to the Aussies. I am also hoping Thorne a Japanese version of PS3 accessory TV tuner will not be an eternal wait like PlayTv. Then we can happily move on without PlayTV as well.
02-03-2010 #3CodeKiller Guest
Soooooo, the rumor has been true about the PS2 emulator in the firmware. I'm really curious about it's capabilities. Finally the 2-usb models can join in the PS2 compatibility list. But will it support the original discs?
02-03-2010 #4heartagram62 Guest
Am I alone in thinking that there isn't a big market for PS1/2 games and that is why backwards compatability was dropped. No one in my friends list is ever playing these old classics.
It's intresting to note that he does mention the premium pay service, I'm glad to see that this feature to supply old games will not be included.
02-03-2010 #5saviour07 Guest
There has been rumours about having ps2 emu via a firmware for ages now, there was a patent found last year which implied that the cell would be used for backward compatibility, and then dev's found a ps2 folder (similar to the psp folder) within the firmware.
All this suggests is that sony are biding their time as to when they are going to release a ps2 emu for all versions of the ps3. It could be they think 2010 is the last year in the ps2's life cycle, it could be to get more third parties on board and get a massive library ready for launch of the emu, it could be part of the premium service when (not "if", it will happen) thats released
Or it could be any mixture of these reasons
We wont know for definite until the end of the year...
02-03-2010 #6bostwick Guest
I second the intense curiosity when they (sony) will give us what I think should have originally came with my 40 gig ps3, The ability to play ps2 games. I from the start felt they would not hand out that capability until they stopped the sales of actual ps2's. I have read in the past market research affected there decision in not pursuing backwards compatibility.
That just means that if you want to play ps3 games you will buy a ps3. Remember sony is in the business of making money. So as long as they offer the ability to play ps2 games (current slim ps2) they will not give the ability on new ps3 unless they charge the additional 100 dallors. as much as a brand new ps2.
02-03-2010 #7JesusFMA Guest
How much does it cost to play a PS2 game on a PS3 VS playing a PS2 game on a PS2? ... Totally not worth it
02-03-2010 #8inginear Guest
to take the debate a step further, do you think they should take out the ps1 b/c also? how much does it cost to play a ps1 game on a ps3 vs playing a ps1 game on a ps1? ... totally not worth it? or is it?
02-03-2010 #9JesusFMA Guest
But I guess that in the end, everyone can use their stuff the way it's more convenient for them ... just my two cents.
02-03-2010 #10adrianc1982 Guest
The ps3 is cheap for the life it can give you as you call it, but your collection is more expensive and some of the games are hard to find. Another thing is the ps1 games that are bought off the psn store dont use the bluray drive so maybe the life of the console is wasting but not the Bluray drive. I my opinion its totally worth it having your reliable machine play whatever you throw in and knowing that if it breaks buying a new one will put a smile on your face.